Meursault's Peculiar Stoicism

Throughout The Stranger, Meursault repeats his mantra that nothing matters, none of his decisions, his emotions, or his circumstances. Instead of showing how cold or strange Meursault is, it highlights something else to me about how Meursault copes with existence. 


After his mother’s funeral, Meursault returns home thinking “that anyway one more Sunday was over, that Maman was buried now, that I was going back to work, and that, really, nothing had changed” (Camus 24). What makes Meursault’s train of thought so bizarre? Meursault displays an extreme form of stoicism where he views most things in life as pointless. As readers, we expect some kind of reflection, we expect the funeral to change Meursault in some way. But in his mind, all the ups and downs of life take people to the same place in the end. A typical protagonist would react viscerally to the death of their mother, which might set the stage for the entire book. Instead, Meursault assures us right away, that he won’t be experiencing any dramatic character growth. 


A little later in the book, when Meursault is faced with potential promotion and life in Paris, he shows similar indifference but goes on to explain, “When I was a student, I had lots of ambitions like that. But when I had to give up my studies I learned very quickly that none of it really mattered” (Camus 41). This passage matters because it was one of the first hints to me that Meursault hadn’t always been as apathetic as he is in the novel’s timeframe. Something changed in his life that transformed his perspective on life for better or worse. At some point, he’d decided to stop caring. Interestingly, it was more or less working for him… until it wasn’t. We talked in class about the possibility of Meursault having an atypical mind, or that he would be diagnosed with some mental disorder in modern times, however, this passage makes me think there’s nothing inherently atypical about his brain, he didn’t behave the way he does in the book his entire life. His narration leaves us only to speculate what his life has been and arrange what we can from scattered comments he makes about his past. 


After his trial has ended and Meursault knows that he’s getting the death penalty, Meursault has a heated interaction with a chaplain. At this moment he thinks to himself, “I had been right, I was still right. I had lived my life one way and I could just as well have lived it another. I had done this and I hadn’t done that…. Nothing, nothing mattered, and I knew why. So did he” (Camus 121). This is another of those rare moments in the book where Meursault reflects on himself. Saying that “I had been right, I was still right” that nothing mattered. It seems that he believes that his death was inevitable despite his behavior, that even without the death penalty, he would still die someday and so nothing is important. Meursault’s extreme form of stoicism got him into a mess but still ended up reinforcing his belief. Meursault takes his circumstances as a testament to the fact that he’s not really in control and that he never was. This belief makes us all uneasy and makes the court at Meursault's trial uneasy, and so they force Meursault to carry that belief to his end.


Comments

  1. This is a really interesting perspective! I hadn't really thought about it in that way before, but it makes a lot of sense that Meursault's sense of meaninglessness is kind of self-perpetuating—he's accept whatever fate throws his way so passively that he doesn't do anything to dig himself out of the messes he gets in, and when he spirals further into trouble, it just becomes more evidence to him that he's not in control.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Strongly agree with your idea that M's indifference stems from a stoic mindset that he's intentionally pursuing in his life. This reminds me of Meursault being very focused on his physical sensations and being in the present moment (ex. he is very much in the moment with Marie after his mom's funeral). As a stoic, he doesn't care about what can't be controlled by him and instead just lives his life to the (in his opinion) fullest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also wondered whether Meursault has always been the way he is, or whether something happened that made him so indifferent. It makes a lot of sense that he's not inherently different, he's just decided that's the easiest stance to have. I also think what you said about the court forcing Meursault to carry that belief to the very end is really interesting. With the priest coming to visit him and all the questioning of his character, it's like all they really wanted was for him to admit that he was wrong so that their own beliefs weren't challenged. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Really cool post! I agree with your thoughts that Meursault may display some corrupted form of stoicism which plays out as really extreme. Even though The Stranger is an existentialist novel, there are many hints of other philosophies in Meursault's personality. For example, Meursault's obsession with pleasure reminds me a lot of Epicureanism.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Meursault's personality and ideology is clearly a result of whatever happened to him in his youth. I think the line you quoted about Meursault's reaction to getting a promotion shows that he wasn't always the way he is, and something happened to him, probably something big, to change his whole outlook and convince him that life is kind of meaningless and he can't do anything to change anything.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts